Answer: FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC)
Explanation:
Decisions made by the Department of Enforcement may be appealed to FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC).
The NAC is the national committee established to recheck or review initial pronouncements or decisions made in FINRA’s Department of Enforcements proceedings.
An individual or firm is given the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC under FINRA's disciplinary procedures. Sometimes the NAC may initiate a review of a decision on its own.
In the process of appeal, the NAC will evaluate whether the hearing panel's findings are right in legal context or not and in accordance with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines.
During a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction of the former proceeding on an individual or firm is not enforced.
However, an individual or firm can further appeal FINRA's decision to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and then to federal court.
Answer:
B. States can use double jeopardy
Explanation:
What is important here in this case is the ruling. This case is one that is concerned with the double Jeopardy clause. Benton ruled here that this clause, which is a fifth amendment clause is applicable to the States. the major aim of this class is to offer protection to a defendant against a second prosecution or trial for the same offence that they have been convicted of.
Answer:
Exertion heat stroke
Explanation:
Exertion heatstroke is the leading cause of preventable death in high school athletics. Heat illness prevention is a course that has been provided in high school to prevent from this stroke. This course is related to maintaining the heat plan. There are some guidelines are mentioned in the course on how to account for the changes in the environment condition and the other related factors. It focuses on the hydrating plan and to establish the emergency plan in regards to the suspension about the exertion heat stroke.
In order to persuade people to accept their advice astrologers use the following techniques:
- Suggestion: to convince you to believe in their predictions, they make you believe that you are about to read valuable information that can change your life forever. If you don't follow their advice, according to them, you would be missing the chance of being a successful, loved and happy person.
- Social acceptance: they give you examples of people that have followed their advice and who are now lively and happy. They even tell you how presidents, ministers and other importan authorities don not take a decision wihout consulting their personal astrologer.
- Mystery: they create a mysterious atmosphere for you to believe you are about to unveil a secret world before your eyes.
- Scarce technique: they claim to be very few the real and authorized astrologers that can tell you reliable information. This will make you believe that if you miss their advice, you run the risk of being deceived by an ill-intentioned person who pretends to be an astrologer, but is no other thing than a scammer.
Researchers like De-Casper use the suckle rate, that is, the rate at which the infants take the breastfeeding, to test the preferences of newborn infants.
<h3>
Who is De Casper?</h3>
Anthony James De Casper is a psychologist who researches the prenatal and neonatal experiences over the development of cognitive abilities in a human being.
The suckling is the process where a newborn baby is fed with her mother's breast milk. The rate of suckling is how fast the newborn infants learn to take fed, is actually used by the researchers like De-Casper to identify the preferences of newborn babies
Therefore, the researchers used the suckle to get to know about the preferences of newborn babies.
Learn more about the De Casper in the mentioned link:
brainly.com/question/4728206
#SPJ1
