It’s easy!
Since you’re increasing 1.6% to $1252 you write the expression as:
=1252+1.6% of 1252
=1252+(1.6/100)*1252
=1252+0.016*1252
=1252+20.032
=1272.032
That’s your final answer
D
If you multiply 3 by 10 and add a zero onto the ten in the question that is 100 in half an hour, all you need to do then is multiply that answer by two to get your answer.
Answer:
The value is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The number of cans is n = 4
The number of can that are empty is N = 3
The number of can filled with water is k = 1
The number number of sets of cans is w = 5
Generally probability of detecting the correct can is mathematically represented as
=> 
=> 
Generally probability of not detecting the correct can is mathematically represented as
Generally the number of cans expected of the farmer to correctly identify by chance is mathematically represented as
=> 
=>
The best way to answer this question is to set up the first sentence as a ratio of large bandages to total bandages. You would write 5 large bandages to 7 total bandages to 7 total bandages. Then you would make this equivalent to x number of large bandages to 60 total. It would look like this 5:7 = x:60. You could use cross products to multiply 60 by 5 to get 300. 7 times x also should equal 300. Unfortunately, this example will not leave us with a whole number of bandages, but 300/7 is a repeating decimal or a mixed number (42 6/7 large bandages).
c and a
by the way, thats easy. NO OFFENCE XD
