Answer:
A
Explanation:
this is indirect comparison
The correct answer is definitely: corruption.
Indeed, the analogy speaks of something rotten and usually what rots are perishable goods as fruit, vegetables and meat. The analogy is using the physical metaphor of putrefaction to show that a state can also putrefy, i.e. be corrupted. A fruit is a physical item; a state is a notion that represents men of power organized and in command of others, using the physical and intellectual resources of the state to run the country.
Shakespeare is using this metaphor to show that moral corruption in turn causes physical corruption. Another notion associated with this analogy is the notion of the body politic versus the body individual. The body individual is the body of a person; the body politic is the state (including the King). King Claudius has murdered King Hamlet and King Hamlets body is rotting in its tomb. Because he was the King of the state, i.e. the body politic, the state is dying and it has been Claudius that has infected it with his corruption.
Marcello’s words foreshadow Prince Hamlet’s discovery of Claudius’ crime.
Answer:
hola buenas tardes sr. le quería pedir de favor en que si me podría dar un adelanto de mi pago por obvias razones ya que necesito el dinero, me podría ayudar en eso.
Explanation: espero y te ayude :).
She has decided to trust him
she is Nieve to trust a stranger
inncorect verb: weren't
It's still a fact at the present today so i would fix it to "Isn't"
