1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paha777 [63]
3 years ago
15

The ways of Heaven are certain: On those who are virtuous, it sends down all blessings, and on the evil-doer it sends down all m

iseries. If you are a good ruler, all of the regions of the empire will be happy and rejoice. If you rule badly, this will bring dishonor to your ancestors and ruin to the empire. According to the passage, what will happen if a ruler ignores the Mandate of Heaven? Check all that apply. He will bring dishonor to his ancestors. He will cause all to be happy and rejoice. He will ruin the empire. He will be virtuous.
History
2 answers:
o-na [289]3 years ago
8 0
Thankfully this is not true. But here me out. the rain falls on the just and the unjust right? I don't see a cone of light following a virtuous person right in the middle of a rainstorm. By thankfully, i mean we all are wrong. We all do things that we regret, or that we know are wrong, and even some things that we don't know are wrong.

Also, I'm not sure how ruling badly brings a bad name on your ancestors, but if someone said, "Bro, you are ruling awfully man. Your ancestors must've been messed up," then i can see why you could say this. ;), Since you decide what you do, your ancestors probably won't get a bad rep. Your ancestors really don't care at this point what you do. Where they are is not affected by what you do.

If you strive do what is right and honor God, you will indeed be blessed by Him, but there will always be a group that complains or argues to get themselves what they want.
Hope this helped!
Ivenika [448]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: He will bring dishonor to his ancestors. & He will ruin the empire.

Explanation: I did it on edge

You might be interested in
What is hangul?<br> Anyone knows
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

lettering

Explanation:

alphabetic system used for writing the Korean language

8 0
4 years ago
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HEELLP PLEASE!
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
C. Would be the correct answer.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Hammurabi’s laws change life in Mesopotamia
Komok [63]
Hammurabi's law changed life's in Mesopotamia by making everything fair with people
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP FAST
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

The First Emperor

Qin Shihuang (259-210 B.C.E.) conquered much in this life, but his driving purpose was even greater; he sought to conquer death. In order to achieve immortality, he built himself a tomb—a vast underground city guarded by a life-size terracotta army including warriors, infantrymen, horses, chariots and all their attendant armor and weaponry.

Terracotta warriors from the mausoleum of the first Qin emperor of China Qin Shihuang, c. 221-206 B.C.E., Qin Dynasty, painted terracotta, Terracotta Warriors and Horses Museum, Shaanxi, China  

(photo: Keith Marshall, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Terracotta warriors from the mausoleum of the first Qin emperor of China Qin Shihuang, c. 221-206 B.C.E., Qin Dynasty, painted terracotta, Terracotta Warriors and Horses Museum, Shaanxi, China (photo: Keith Marshall, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Terracotta warriors from the mausoleum of the first Qin emperor of China Qin Shihuang, c. 221-206 B.C.E., Qin Dynasty, painted terracotta, Terracotta Warriors and Horses Museum, Shaanxi, China

(photo: Keith Marshall, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The underground terracotta army found in the First Emperor’s burial complex is undoubtedly one of the most remarkable and mysterious discoveries from the ancient world. A sprawling citadel has been unearthed, complete with gardens and stables, bronze ritual vessels, jade jewelry, and a wealth of gold and silver ornaments.

Besides revealing much about an ancient way of life, observing the physical construction of the underground complex and the methodical production of the figures reveals a set of themes from which we gain a window of insight to the First Emperor’s worldview and enduring influence.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After crossing the Delaware on Christmas night, 1776, Washington and his troops were victorious in the Battles of Trenton and Pr
    11·1 answer
  • Four reasons why you shouldn't be a roman prisoner
    15·1 answer
  • What traditional Flemish symbols can you identify in the piece below?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following are key beliefs of Hinduism
    11·2 answers
  • Technological progress leads to which of the following?
    7·2 answers
  • One major reason for us involvement in latin america in the 1980’s was to
    11·1 answer
  • Many poorer nations have seen rapid ______, or the movement of rural people to the cities
    6·2 answers
  • What can be done to prevent child deaths caused by routine illnesses in the developing world
    11·2 answers
  • The prodution process is never complete unti it reaches the final consumer​
    11·1 answer
  • how did the code of Indian Offenses try to force native Americans to assimilate in terms of funeral and mourning practices
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!