Whenever a product line or a product family is extended, there is a risk of cannibalization, which occurs when sales of an existing brand decline as the firm's current customers switch to the new product.
<h3>What is a new product line?</h3>
This is term that is used to refer to the offering of a new product from a line that the company has not offered previously. It is the introduction of a new product entirely to the market.
Hence we have to say that Whenever a product line or a product family is extended, there is a risk of cannibalization, which occurs when sales of an existing brand decline as the firm's current customers switch to the new product.
Read ore on cannibalization here: brainly.com/question/17772125
#SPJ1
Answer:
A).The franchisor provides a tried and tested product to sell
C ). The franchisee receives ongoing help and support from the franchisor
Explanation:
A franchise is an arrangement where an established and successful business person( franchisor) licenses a third party( franchisee) to set up an independent branch similar to the franchisor business. The franchisor permits the franchisee to use their brand name, colors, processes, and procedures and sell their products. Therefore, the franchisee's branch will be similar in all aspects to the other franchisor's branches.
The franchisor provides technical, operational, and managerial support to the franchisee. The franchisee pays an initial fee and a percentage of monthly sales to the franchisor to open a franchise business.
She is an example of an <u>"interactive" </u>leader.
Interactive leadership focuses on making the association's welfare the main need by developing every single representative to help its bearing and endeavors. Strong pioneers persistently stress the way that if the association wins, everybody wins. Each worker movement that helps and advances this conviction must be sustained and supported.
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Answer:
Office Equipment (Debit) 96,000
Accounts Payable (Credit) 96,000
Explanation:
Buffalo Corporation should have made the above stated entry. As the equipment is supposed to start depreciation from the date of purchase (when the asset is available for use as intended by management). Since the corporation intended to take the discount by paying early within the number of days allowed so upon payment the following entry should be made.
Accounts Payable (Debit) 96,000
Purchase Discount Income (Credit) 9,600
Cash (Credit) 86,400
