Answer: utilitarian
Explanation:
Utilitarianism: this is one of the oldest, best known and most influential moral theories.
Like other forms of moral theories, its core principles is that whether an action is morally right or wrong depends on the final outcome or effects of such actions.
To be more specific, the only effects of actions that are relevant here are the good and bad results that they produce that such action produces nothing else matters.
To solve this problem, we will use a valuation method
named income valuation includes discounting of the profits the stock will
carry to the stockholder in the probable future, and a final value on disposal.
Solution:
1.57 (1.05) / (.14 - .05)
= 18.32. the answer is letter d.
<span> </span>
Answer:
The term used to describe the reduction of the balance owed on a loan with each payment made over a period of time is:
d. amortization.
Explanation:
Amortization of a loan is the gradual reduction of the balance owed on a loan because payments are being made over a period of time. Each payment is, therefore, a reduction of the borrowed fund. This gradual reduction through periodic payments is called amortization of the borrowed fund. Loan amortization, therefore, implies the spreading out of the loan payments over time. It is not the same as asset amortization, which is a kind of depreciation.
Answer:
1. Calculate the NPV for each option available for the project. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answers in dollars, not millions of dollars, e.g. 1,234,567.)
- go to market now = $744,000
- focus group = $852,000
- consulting firm = $916,000
2. Which action should the firm undertake?
The NPV is higher than the rst of the options.
Explanation:
expected payoffs:
- option 1 (go to market now) = (40% x $1.86 million) + 0 = $744,000
- option 2 (focus group) = (55% x $1.86 million) + 0 = $1,023,000
- option 3 (consulting firm) = (70% x $1.86 million) + 0 = $1,302,000
expected NPVs:
- option 1 (go to market now) = $744,000
- option 2 (focus group) = $1,023,000 - $171,000 = $852,000
- option 3 (consulting firm) = $1,302,000 - $386,000 = $916,000
go to market now
Answer:
You could use a private sharing system or application that grants access through custom settings. Also, It should display page layouts and it should have field-level security.
Explanation:
If the company wants to ensure that a few staff members and reps can view the rep's evaluation records, thus the private sharing application should grant access through custom settings. The page layouts should be specific by accounts, numerical scores, and executive comments. These page layouts should use field-level security to restrict reps to view the executive comment field on their review.
