Answer: C. Less potential for abuse of power
Explanation:
With a Federal government, power is divided between the Federal government and the state government. Even though the Federal government has power over the state government, there are certain powers that belongs to the state government alone that the Federal government cannot infringe upon unless the state government acts against the Constitution of the nation.
This division of powers reduces the potential for abuse of power because neither government has the absolute power necessary to act in an abusive way to its citizens.
In Simons and Chabris’s (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team’s basketball passes while ignoring the black team’s basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur
C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur
D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data
Answer:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.
This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.
The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D.
Answer:
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Explanation:
please mark me brainllest
Answer: A. All else equal
Explanation: Ceteris paribus is the commonly used Latin phrase used by the economist meaning 'all else equal.' The concept of ceteris paribus is important in economics because in the real world, it is usually hard to isolate all the different variables that may influence or change the outcome of what you are studying.
Answer:
Lacks random assignment
Explanation:
the researcher may not Be able to establish valid causal relationships as the study lacks random assignment in that participants do not get equal opportunity of being assigned to groups. Random assignment means the researcher applies chance in assigning participants to groups such that the study is not biased and causal relationships are not affected. For example if a participant does not get to choose his group, the researcher randomly flips a coin to assign him to a group and so there is an uncorrupted result in findings
