Answer: Yes
Explanation: The grocery had the duty to use due care to stay its premises during a reasonably safe condition for invitees or to warn them of a hazard. Whether a condition constitutes a danger may be a function of reasonableness. That is, if the ordinarily prudent man could foresee that harm was a possible results of a condition, then it's a danger. the shop knew or should have known that water was present and continuing to accumulate on the ground, and that they negligently did not remove the water.
Is a question of Google Analytics Exam.
The correct answer is:
Attribution modeling
Explanation and more info: http://www.certificationanswers.com/en/what-is-the-set-of-rules-that-determines-how-sales-and-conver....
It’ll be close to 1 million+ since 2016
<span>Despite the small improvements in working conditions and wages, African Americans couldn't get better jobs - limited to mainly the plantations. They wished to own land but it was not becoming a reality.</span>
