According to Mill, the main criticism of utilitarianism is that it is incompatible with justice.
As per Mill, utilitarianism is consistent with the key tenets of how we typically conceive about justice.
The common understanding of justice is that certain interests should be given priority; we refer to them as being safeguarded by rights.
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasizing results. It embodies consequentialism in some way.
According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest good for the largest number of people is the most morally right one.
Mill backs up this assertion by demonstrating how all other things that people desire are either ways to achieve happiness or are part of the concept of happiness.
The sense of justice is essentially founded on utility, and rights only exist because they are required for human enjoyment, according to Mill, who goes into great detail about this.
To know more about justice, visit:
brainly.com/question/7104813
#SPJ4
Because they need to treat there kids with care
Julius Ceasar a famous roman emperor reigned for only one year at the end of the republican period.
Julius Caesar become a Roman general and politician who named himself dictator of the Roman Empire, a rule that lasted much less than 365 days before he turned into famously assassinated with the aid of political opponents in forty-four B.C.
Julius Caesar wielded his strength to make the senate bigger, created needed authorities reforms, and reduced Rome's debt. At the same time, he backed the construction of the discussion board Iulium and rebuilt two city-states, Carthage and Corinth. He also granted citizenship to foreigners dwelling within the Roman Republic.
Leading the republic have been consuls who have been elected through legislative assemblies. They served for one year, presided over the Roman Senate, and commanded the Roman army. Although their power turned into fairly restrained by the establishment of different magistrate positions, the consuls were successfully the heads of the kingdom.
Learn more about Julius Caesar here brainly.com/question/1324420
#SPJ4
Answer: Social markers of difference.
Explanation: The social markers of diffence are a field study of social cience, with the goal of explain how the inequalities and hierarchies of all people are developed by the human history. The groups of people who are discriminated or disadvantage by the course of time are the focus in this social area.
Social markers of difference, beyond a study, is a form to help discriminated or disadvantage people know your own story and, even more, recognize yourselves as a important piece of the society puzzle, and to claim your rights in the right and effective ways.
Studies such as these make it possible to see more directly how worked theories are extended to society in the form of fostering public policies.
Many of the recent reflections on the production of difference and analysis of social inequality have been putting forth the articulation between the so called "social markers of difference". In this broad field - that involves debates on differential rights, acknowledgement policies, the production of new sensibilities, and at the same time the reformulation of past forms of exclusion - the intersection between race, nation, sexuality and gender is high lightened.
Answer:
3. are unsure what is effective
Explanation:
Informational social influence is a phenomenon in social psychology, which describes the tendency of an individual to act or behave as others who they perceive are "right" act or behave. The individual, when faced with situations that they have limited knowledge about, looks up to others' behaviours and decisions and thereby confirm to the knowledge of others they perceive might be knowledgeable.
Someone who is unsure of what is effective is usually very susceptible to informational social influence, and would most likely just agree with what others agree on.
