1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olchik [2.2K]
3 years ago
9

Why did General Gage take British troops to Concord?

History
1 answer:
Inessa [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There were a few reasons why General Gage sent his British troops to Lexington and Concord in 1775. The British had heard that the colonists were storing gunpowder in Concord. They wanted to move to Concord to capture the gunpowder.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are native Americans
kirill115 [55]
Basically the first people :)
6 0
3 years ago
/explain and evaluate the views of anaximander regarding the nature of substance.
chubhunter [2.5K]

Early Greek philosopher Anixamander (ca. 610 – 545 BC) was a monist.  That means he believed that ultimately there is just one sort of substance underlying all the different things we see in the physical universe. He put forth the idea that this single underlying substance of all things is something beyond our experience.  He called it the ἄπειρον (<em>apeiron</em>), which means "the boundless" or "the limitless."  Anaximander was reacting to the views of Thales, a previous thinker from his same town, Miletus, who had suggested that there was one underlying substance to all things, and that <u>water</u> was that essential element.  Anaximander objected to Thales' thought, because water is something we all see and experience readily in the perceived world.  He believed any underlying or base-level substance, from which water and any other physical stuff originated, had to be something beyond the boundaries of our present experience, or "the boundless."

One evaluation of Anaximander's views came from another Milesian philosopher who followed him:  Anaximenes.  Anaximenes saw the theory of Anaximander as dodging the question, "What is the main ingredient of all things in the universe."  By saying, "It's boundless; it's something we don't know," had he really answered anything?  So Anaximenes dismissed the view of Anaximander ... but didn't agree with Thales either.  Anaximenes proposed that air was the underlying element of all physical phenomena.

You'll have to decide for yourself what you think of Anaximander's "boundless" theory.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement BEST evaluates the significance of early trade networks across the
natulia [17]

Answer:D

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What took place when people tried to immigrate to Texas after the<br> Mexican American War?
Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer:

hjgbh

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Helpppp this one tooo I’m doing a test
romanna [79]
D. Illegal search and seizure
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain the term popular sovereignty
    15·1 answer
  • What social class had the greatest amount of power in feudal Europe?
    8·2 answers
  • The platt amendment effectively made cuba into an american
    5·1 answer
  • What were most of the problems between the Indians and white settlers the result of
    12·1 answer
  • What do the following three inventions have to do with Europeans starting to colonize Africa?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Bill of Rights have to be written
    15·1 answer
  • The United States territories in Micronesia are
    9·2 answers
  • HURRY IT DUE IN 3 MINUTES!!!! At the local level, political parties are responsible for
    7·2 answers
  • Which are examples of the discrimination that European Jews endured throughout history? Choose five answers.
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the author chose the title “Words On Fire” for the book? Does it have any significance or special meaning to the book?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!