1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
3 years ago
5

He Fed increased the supply of US dollars at an average rate of 6 percent per year over the 1980-2005 period. Based on the theor

y of production capacity, if the Fed had instead increased the money supply at the rate of 7 percent per year during that period, given other policies.
A. The average inflation rate during 1980-2005 would have been one percentage point higher than it actually was in that period.B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s.C. The price level in 2005 would have been about 28 percent higher than what it actually reached in that year.D. The output of the economy in the mid-2000s would not have been very different from the levels it actually reached.
Business
2 answers:
Oksi-84 [34.3K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s.

Explanation:

This choice is based on the theory of production capacity, which tries to explain that industrial capacity of companies increases with increased supply of production resources.  Capital is one of the production resources which is increased with increased supply of US dollars.  Increased money supply increases the capital which banks can lend out to companies to increase their production capacity.

On the other hand, where this to be based on the theory of inflation, a different answer would have been produced.  The theory of inflation recognizes that the average inflation rate increases proportionately to a percentage increase in money supply, among other factors that influence inflation rates.

That the price level in 2005 would have been about 28 percent higher than what it actually reached in that year is highly speculative.  And D is certainly not the correct option, because the economy's output is increased with increased production capacity caused by increased money supply.

MArishka [77]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: A. The average inflation rate during 1980-2005 would have been one percentage point higher than it actually was in that period.

B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s

Explanation:

If the Fed increased money supply at a 1% rate higher than it had, then average inflation would have been higher than it actually was. This is because an increase in money supply leads to a rise in inflation simply because there is more money in the economy so people are able to buy more goods and services. As they do so prices would have to rise to match this demand.

Also the Economic output of the US would have been high in the mid-2000s due to the cumulative effects of a high money supply in the previous years. This is because firms would have had to match the growing demand for goods and services by expanding their production capacity. With a higher money supply, the cost of borrowing will be less so firms would easily be able to borrow money to finance their expansion and meet the said demand thereby raising the level of economic output.

You might be interested in
Hugh is in charge of creating the value proposition for a new start-up company. In order for him to create an effective value pr
marta [7]

Answer:

Who is the target buyer for the offering, what is the offering to the buyer, why is the offering unique for the customer

Explanation:

Since in the given situation, it is mentioned that the hugh developed the value proposition for newly startup company so for developing the effective value proposition he need to answer the question for a consumer that involved about the target purchaser who is offering, the offering made to the buyer and the unique offering made to the customer

These 3 types of questions he need to answer

4 0
3 years ago
Tình hình kinh tế và triển vọng phát triển của việt nam
kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

English plzzz

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Financial data for Stirling Inc. for last year are as follows:
Tom [10]

Answer:

profit margin: 6.04%

Assets turnover: 2.08

ROI 25.89%

Residual Income 137,330

Explanation:

<u><em>profit margin:</em></u>

income/sales = 326,480/5,404,000 = 0.060414507 = 6.0414507%

<u><em>Assets turnover:</em></u>

\frac{net \: sales}{average \: assets} \\\\where:\\average \: assets = \frac{ending + beginning}{2}

(2,561,000 + 2,629,000)/2 = 2,595,000 average assets

5,404,000/2,595,000 = 2.082466281 Assets TO

<u><em>ROI</em></u>

\frac{net \: income}{average \: equity} \\\\where:\\average \: equity= \frac{ending + beginning}{2}

(1,206,000+1,316,000)/2 = 1,261,000 average equity

326,480/1,261,000 = 25.890563%

<u>Residual Income:</u>

current income - income at desired RoR

That means calculate which income generates a ROI of 15% which is the minimum required return:

ROI = income / equity = 0.15

X/1,261,000 = 0.15

X=1,261,000 x 0.15 = 189,150

Now we calculate the diference between this number and the current income.

326,480 - 189,150 = 137,330 Residual Income

8 0
3 years ago
Burns Industries currently manufactures and sells 18,000 power saws per month, although it has the capacity to produce 33,000 un
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

Burns Industries

Using an incremental analysis approach, Burns should consider accepting this special order only if the price per unit offered by Allen is at least:

above $38 (the variable cost per unit).

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Monthly production and sales units = 18,000

Production capacity per month = 33,000 units

Costs at the 18,000-unit-per-month level of production:

Variable costs = $38

Fixed costs =        23

Total per unit =  $61

Selling price per unit = $78

Special offer for 4,800 saws per month, without changing the fixed manufacturing costs.

b) Incremental analysis approach is a management decision technique that specifies that only relevant, marginal, or differential costs should be taken into account.  It rules out the inclusion of sunk or fixed costs, which do not change between alternatives.

3 0
3 years ago
How do i make someones answer the brainliest
Aleksandr [31]
I don’t get what your saying

But could u give more explanation
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When the marketing concept is used to make all business decisions, how many
    9·1 answer
  • A firm has an outstanding issue of 1,000 shares of preferred stock with a $100 par value and an 8 percent annual dividend. The f
    12·1 answer
  • The phase of a weight-training program in which most of the strength gains are realized is the ________ phase science-forums
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these rules of etiquette exists at every workplace?
    9·2 answers
  • "Although experience and expertise are important in the hiring decision, many employers are looking at other attributes to decid
    10·1 answer
  • A chart that shows the connection between consumer demand and price is a
    9·2 answers
  • The Draper Company is considering dropping its Doombug toy due to continuing losses. Revenue and costs data on the toy for the p
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose the U.S. foreign assets are 67 percent of the U.S.​ GDP, and the U.S. foreign liabilities are 95 percent of the U.S. GDP
    10·1 answer
  • The purchaser of a franchise is called the?
    15·2 answers
  • A house worth $180,000 has a coinsurance clause of 75 percent. The owners insure the property for $101,250. They then have a los
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!