In order to provide a piece of evidence to compare the level of the Incas’ and Maya culture’s investments in public works projects, you can mention the following:
As regards Incas' architecture: Qollqa were stone houses situated on hillsides. They had drainage canals in order to keep the interior dry. Another example can be Machu Picchu that was a settlement like a fortress (located in the High Andes of Perú)
As regards Mayas' architecture: its region consisted of the northern lowlands, their pyramids relied on intricately carved stone. They built temples like 'The Temple of the Cross at Palenque. Usually, their structures were covered with stucco to smooth imperfections. Besides, their structures were aligned so as to have an astronomical observation.
Answer:
they joined to british forces because they were seeking liberty
Explanation:
Answer:
Mostly money and promise of the American dream.
Many poor Europeans and other immigrants heard about the Americans and their lavish lives and wanted to try their luck and escape their poverty. However, they didn't have enough money to emigrate to America which is why they would become indentured servants.
This meant that they would sign a contract with their employer who would then pay for their travel expenses to America, and in turn they would have to work for them for a number of years in return for food and shelter. When the contract expired, ideally the indentured servant became free (although this didn't always happen). Their status was slightly better than that of a slave.
(Since you didn't give us any options, I can't tell you the exact answer).
To Gary Nash, individualism, became a great help to the slavery of African Americans, since as a historian, this was his focus. While it has always been America's stance that God created all men equal, this did not directly apply to the slaves as an argument by Nash.
