Answer:
293 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
284.58-17.95=266.63
266.63/0.91=293
293 miles
I'm sorry but what was the question? Uploading the Image would be helpful.
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
Answer:
the first answer is correct
the second answer is correct if they messed up on the question and meant to ask for the MAD of set B
I think the 3rd answer is incorrect (I got 1.09), so you might want to double-check your 3rd answer since it is asking for "times bigger", not how much bigger, which means how many times larger is the MAD of set A than that of set B and to find how many times bigger a number is than another number, you have to divide the first number by the second number.
Step-by-step explanation:
$2.19 is the rate of change
