Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation: I believe it's A because It's the opposite but I'm not 100% certain, because I don't remember inverse statements.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
no feasible solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
There are so many inequalities that determining the area covered by all 5 of them is problematic. Hence, we have reversed all of them in the attached graph, so any feasible solution region would remain white. Alas, there is no such region.
This system of inequalities has <em>no feasible solution</em>.
First it was 186,000 and then the second year it was 202,000 what is the expenses is 16000
Each share would receive 100 because 15000/150 = 150, so D. $100 is the correct answer.
We are given with the rectangle shaped deck which has a width of 29 feet and a perimeter of 134 feet. the perimeter of a rectangle is equal to twice the sum of length and width. hence the equation goes :
134 ≤ 2* (29 + L)
67 <span>≤ 29 + L
38 </span><span>≤ L
length should be greater or less than 38 feet</span>
