recalling that d = rt, distance = rate * time.
we know Hector is going at 12 mph, and he has already covered 18 miles, how long has he been biking already?

so Hector has been biking for those 18 miles for 3/2 of an hour, namely and hour and a half already.
then Wanda kicks in, rolling like a lightning at 16mph.
let's say the "meet" at the same distance "d" at "t" hours after Wanda entered, so that means that Wanda has been traveling for "t" hours, but Hector has been traveling for "t + (3/2)" because he had been biking before Wanda.
the distance both have travelled is the same "d" miles, reason why they "meet", same distance.
![\bf \begin{array}{lcccl} &\stackrel{miles}{distance}&\stackrel{mph}{rate}&\stackrel{hours}{time}\\ \cline{2-4}&\\ Hector&d&12&t+\frac{3}{2}\\[1em] Wanda&d&16&t \end{array}\qquad \implies \begin{cases} \boxed{d}=(12)\left( t+\frac{3}{2} \right)\\[1em] d=(16)(t) \end{cases}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Blcccl%7D%20%26%5Cstackrel%7Bmiles%7D%7Bdistance%7D%26%5Cstackrel%7Bmph%7D%7Brate%7D%26%5Cstackrel%7Bhours%7D%7Btime%7D%5C%5C%20%5Ccline%7B2-4%7D%26%5C%5C%20Hector%26d%2612%26t%2B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5B1em%5D%20Wanda%26d%2616%26t%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cboxed%7Bd%7D%3D%2812%29%5Cleft%28%20t%2B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%29%5C%5C%5B1em%5D%20d%3D%2816%29%28t%29%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D)

●✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎❀✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎●
Hi my lil bunny!
❧⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯☙
The simplest method to find a rational number between two rational numbers x and y is to divide their sum by 2.
❧⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯☙
●✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎❀✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎●
Have a great day/night!
❀*May*❀
Answer:
11 + n
Step-by-step explanation:
sum means addition, so u need a + sign
n is usually the variable used for 'a number'
so 11 and (+) a number (n) = 11+ n
hope this helps!
Answer:
- False
- True
-- False
-- True
-- True
Step-by-step explanation:
The points are
,
,
,
and
---- missing from the question
Given

Required
Determine if each of the points would be on 
To do this, we simply substitute the value of x and of each point in
.
(a)
In this case;
and 
becomes




<em>The point </em>
<em> won't be on the graph because the corresponding value of y for </em>
<em> is </em>
<em></em>
(b) 
In this case;


becomes





<em>The point </em>
<em> would be on the graph because the corresponding value of y for </em>
is 
(c) 
In this case:

becomes





<em>The point </em>
<em> wouldn't be on the graph because the corresponding value of y for </em>
<em> is </em>
<em></em>
(d) 
In this case;

becomes


<em>The point </em>
<em> would be on the graph because the corresponding value of y for </em>
is 
(e)
In this case:
; 
becomes




<em>The point </em>
<em> would be on the graph because the corresponding value of y for </em>
is 
Answer:


And we can find the limits in order to consider values as significantly low and high like this:


Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".
The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.
Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".
Solution to the problem
For this case we can consider a value to be significantly low if we have that the z score is lower or equal to - 2 and we can consider a value to be significantly high if its z score is higher tor equal to 2.
For this case we have the mean and the deviation given:


And we can find the limits in order to consider values as significantly low and high like this:

