Answer:
a
Explanation:
they wont reach the federal courts
Answer:
By mutual understanding and cooperation.
Explanation:
Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.
It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.
<h3>Can you enforce a verbal contract?</h3>
As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.
<h3>Is an oral agreement still binding?</h3>
A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.
Learn more about oral contract: brainly.com/question/15104947
#SPJ13
The Constitution restricts original jurisdiction cases to those concerning disputes between the States or disputes arising among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers. Parties who are not contented with the decision of the lower court have to petition the US supreme court to hear their cases. The basic means to petition the court for review to ask is to grant a writ certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review.
2. Both the federal rule and school rule are made by the constituted authorities and they are most commonly for the good of those in the community. If there were no school rules, students would feel free to do whatever they want even if it would lead to them hurting others.
3. Court determines what really happened and what should be done about it. Courts determine whether a person committed a crime and what the punishment should be. Courts also determine a peaceful way to decide private disputes that people can't resolve themselves. The county courts are sometimes referred to "the people's courts", as the county courts' work involves a myriad of citizen disputes, such as traffic offense, less serious criminal matters (misdemeanors), and relatively small monetary disputes.
<h3>What are the answers to other questions?</h3>
4. The community service is given to the offender always depends on the crime, usually the community services are assigned to people who have committed minor crimes, the law already had some comparisons to the crime to know if the criminal goes to jail or community service, in addition to the law also assesses whether the criminal has committed more than 2 times the crime or has only done it once.
5. Often first time offenders would have the ability to turn around their behavior. Being exposed to the severe criminal element of prisons or jails could in fact breed a worse criminal rather than deterring from their felonious or criminal behavior. I think the severity of the act should depend on jail term associated with and if they are able to enroll in diversion programs. So in some ways one would argue that it is fair!
Therefore, the correct answers are as given above
learn more about court: brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
