Answer:
1. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - gave Johnson authority to retaliate militarily in Vietnam.
2. Cold War - bloodless conflict between the United States and the Soviets.
3. Marshall Plan- gave financial aid to European nations.
4. Bay of Pigs - the Cuban invasion that attempted to overthrow Castro.
5. Potsdam meetings - determined the future of occupied nations following World War II.
6. Vietnamization - withdrawal of United States troops from Vietnam.
Explanation:
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President John the power to take all necessary steps to retaliate any armed attack by the Vietnamese communist regime against the military of the United States. It aimed at preventing any large scale aggression or damage to the US military by Vietnam.
The Cold War occurred right after the end of the Second World War. It was an ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. The US wanted to expand capitalism while Soviet Union tried to expand Socialism.
The Marshall Plan was a plan to give billions of dollars as financial aid to European nations which were devastated during the Second World War. The Marshall Plan was also called as the Economic Recovery Act of 1948.
The Bay of Pigs invasion was an attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro's communist regime in Cuba. This invasion program was headed by President John F Kennedy in 1961.
The Potsdam meeting was a conference among the Big Three nations- Soviet Union, Britain and United States. It aimed at determining the fate of occupied European nations after the end of the Second World War.
Vietnamization was a policy which aimed at withdrawing the United States' military from Vietnam and transferring the power of governance to South Vietnam in 1970.
The answer is most definitly c john jay
Answer:
Good choices are:
Italy:
Mussolini seized power.
Ethiopia was invaded.
Supporters were called Blackshirts.
Japan:
Military leaders seized power.
All men over 20 were conscripted.
China was invaded.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.
1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.
2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.
3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.
The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.
1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.
2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.
