Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
I believe the answer is about 78.81% because you subtract 25 from 118. Then that would be 93. 118 is equal to the 100% and 118 divide by 1.18 equals 100. Divide 93 from 1.18 gives you the answer
The first one is < because if you have 5 part of 7, you have more parts than if you have 4 parts of 7, but it’s negative so it’s the opposite
A={0,2,4,6}, C={1,3,5,7}
A∩C, means that we need to find the same number in A and C. We can see that there are no the same numbers in set A and set C,
so A∩C=∅, empty set of numbers.
BU(A∩C)
"U" means that set will include all numbers of the set B and set (A∩C). Because A∩C=∅, empty set of numbers, (A∩C) does not have any numbers, so
BU(A∩C) includes only numbers of the set B.
So, BU(A∩C)={1,2,3,4,5}.
Answer is {1,2,3,4,5}.
