Answer: During the year after the acquisition, the undervalued equipment will exceed Abbott's investment revenue by $1,200.
Explanation:
Multiply the amount exceeded of its carrying value by the % shares owned by Abbott.
Then divide the result by the useful life value of Barta's equipments
= (20,000 x 30%) / 5
= $1,200
Answer:
The correct answer is A and B
Explanation:
Law of increasing the opportunity cost is the principle or the concept which is defined as the company continue to increase the production of one good, the opportunity cost of producing the next unit will increase.
It is as to reallocate the resources in order to produce that one good which was better or best suited to produce the original good.
The law of opportunity cost occur when some of the resources are best suited for some tasks or products instead of others and it will lead to increase in production with increase in the opportunity cost too.
Computer, its a larger amount of money to pay so it would be best there
Answer:
a) H0: u = presence of a unit root
HA: u ≠ presence of a unit root ( i.e. stationary series )
b) t stat = -0.064
c) We will reject the Null hypothesis and the next step will be to accept the alternative hypothesis
d) It is not valid to compare the estimated t stat with the corresponding critical value because a random walk is non-stationary while the difference is stationary because it is white noise
Explanation:
<u>a) stating the null and alternative hypothesis</u>
H0: u = presence of a unit root
HA: u ≠ presence of a unit root ( i.e. stationary series )
<u>b) performing the test </u>
critical value = -2.88
T stat = coefficient / std error
= -0.02 / 0.31 = -0.064
c) From the test, the value of T stat > critical value we will reject the Null hypothesis hence the next step will be to accept the alternative hypothesis
d) It is not valid to compare the estimated t stat with the corresponding critical value because a random walk is non-stationary while the difference is stationary because it is white noise
What is the question? There is no question in this statement.
