Well many loved him and some were not as fond of him.
Hope this helps:)
Answer:
Helot, a state-owned serf of the ancient Spartans. The ethnic origin of helots is uncertain, but they were probably the original inhabitants of Laconia (the area around the Spartan capital) who were reduced to servility after the conquest of their land by the numerically fewer Dorians. After the Spartan conquest of Messenia in the 8th century BCE, the Messenians were also reduced to the status of helots.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>It</em><em> </em><em>favours</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>formation</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>products</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Before the election the previous president was John Quincy Adams, but Andrew Jackson won.
Based on this information we can reject the following options:
John Quincy Adams was a popular president, and Andrew Jackson ran a poor campaign. (else he wouldn't win)
John Quincy Adams was such a popular president that Andrew Jackson lost despite running a strong campaign
Now, John Quincy Adams was not a very bad president, but Andrew Jackson won because of his campain:
the correct answer is:
John Quincy Adams was an unpopular president, and Andrew Jackson ran a strong campaign.
Hey do you still need help with this one?
If so, I find this question to be much more of a personal opinion, rather than a question someone else could answer for you. If there are no options for this question, I figure this is a question that can be answered with 3 or 4 sentences at least.
Hope this helps in some sort of way. :)