Answer:
Dred Scott v Sanford
Explanation:
In <u>Dred Scott v Sanford</u>, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.
In the Dred Scott v Sanford case, Dred Scott a black American who had lived an a territory were slavery had been banned sued for his freedom arguing that since he had lived in illinois and Wisconsin, both free territory, he was a free man. However, the court ruled that he was still a slave, the Supreme court corroborated the ruling of the lesser court that he was still a slave and therefore had no legal right and cannot sue.
In amendment two third of the total senate and house representatives rectified the bill to date have been proposed. Up to the date 27 amendments were approved.
Explanation:
In 1789 it was decided that how a amendment would become a part of the constitution. All 27 amendments were rectified in the presence of two third of senate and house representatives. For final approval it need to go through a voting system including the members of the senate.
Congress has the final power of giving approval of the appeal made by two third member of the legislative members. Two ways of proposing an amendment either to call two third member for voting or to call them for a national convention.
The rise of the middle class in the age of empire
Establishing colonies<span> would also allow </span>Spain<span> to increase its trade. This would also benefit the </span>Spanish<span> economy. Another reason for establishing </span>colonies<span> in the Americas was to spread their religion. The </span>Spanish<span> were Catholic and they wanted to do missionary work and spread the Catholic religion.</span>