<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
Answer:
The topics like what is ethics?, emerging of ethical values and why they are important in making a better society than before.
Explanation:
The reason is that not all the employees are well educated and professionals but ethics can be learned easily because it depends upon the judgement and doing good for others and yourself.
So the best thing is that you must start course with the introduction of ethics and then how ethical values emerged in the history and why are important for the society. This let them understand that acting ethical is very important because it provides safety to all of the individuals and creates better environment that we all desire.
Answer:
real options perspective
Explanation:
A real options perspective means that the investor has the right but not the obligation to invest in the other company, and/or has the right to buy it, but it is not required to do so. In this case, Fervana can invest if it considers it suitable or it can buy the start-up, buit it doesn't need to do anything if it doesn't want to.
Well a bond is a government loan where they take ur money and pay u back with interest usually low interest tho
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
