Answer:
the action of using our mind to produce ideas, decision, memories, etc
opinion or judgement
Answer:
It acts on behalf of the citizens to maintain peaceful coexistence. A government is necessary because it is an organized system of leadership that is needed in any society.
<h2><u>
We live in a society</u></h2><h2><u>
</u></h2>
A short story about a person lying to protect a friend is an example of vignette methods.
Vignettes are short stories about a hypothetical person that have traditionally been used in quantitative or qualitative research on sensitive topics in the developed world. Vignette studies are emerging in the developing world, but there has been no critical examination of their utility in such settings.
Because of their descriptive nature, vignettes are important because they can illuminate significant information, create depth of character, or provide insight into past events or circumstances. This contributes to a more complete picture of the larger story. Vignettes are used to provide detail in all stories.
Learn more about Vignette here:
brainly.com/question/10483816
#SPJ4
The trail of tears was a part of the removal of native cherokee indians from their territories east of the mississippi to western territiories such as oklahoma.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
