One way for a country to curb runaway inflation is to impose price controls. The price controls a government regulation establishing a maximum price to be charged for specified goods and services, especially during periods of war or inflation. In addition, polycentric pricing allows management in each global market to establish its own prices and market holding strategy is often used in response to unfavorable currency swings
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
A) investors
Explanation:
The main aim of financial accounting to provide information to the investors( existing and would-be) about the performance and position of the business at a particular point in time.
Performance relates to net income earned while the position is about the net assets of the company which is an offshoot of all the assets owned and liabilities(obligations) owed to other parties
Answer:
The value of the settlement today = $231,897.79
Explanation:
The value of the settlement today is the sum of the present value (PV) of cash inflows discounted at the discount rate of 5.7 %.
Year PV
1 35,000 × 1.057^(-1) = 33112.58
2 39,000× 1.057^(-2) = 34907.16
3. 80,000× 1.057^(-3) = 67743.09
4 120,000 × 1.057^(-4) =96134.94
The Pv of the total cash in flow =33,112.58 + 34,907.17 + 67,743.09 + 96,134.95 = 231,897.79
The value of the settlement today = $231,897.79
Answer:
a. 9.98%
Explanation:
The computation of required rate of return is shown below:-
Required return= Risk - Free rate + Beta × (Market rate- Risk-free rate)
11.75% = 2.30% + 1.23 × (Market rate - 2.3%)
(11.75% - 2.30%) ÷ 1.23 = Market rate - 2.3%
Market rate = (11.75% - 2.30%) ÷ 1.23 + 2.3%
=9.98%
Therefore for computing the required rate of return on the market we simply applied the above formula.
