<span>During a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia, Senator Joseph McCarthy (Republican-Wisconsin) claims that he has a list with the names of over 200 members of the Department of State that are “known communists.” The speech vaulted McCarthy to national prominence and sparked a nationwide hysteria about subversives in the American government.Speaking before the Ohio County Women’s Republican Club in Wheeling, West Virginia, Senator McCarthy waved before his audience a piece of paper. According to the only published newspaper account of the speech, McCarthy said that, “I have here in my hand a list of 205 [State Department employees] that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.” In the next few weeks, the number fluctuated wildly, with McCarthy stating at various times that there were 57, or 81, or 10 communists in the Department of State. In fact, McCarthy never produced any solid evidence that there was even one communist in the State Department.Despite McCarthy’s inconsistency, his refusal to provide any of the names of the “known communists,” and his inability to produce any coherent or reasonable evidence, his charges struck a chord with the American people. The months leading up to his February speech had been trying ones for America’s Cold War policies. China had fallen to a communist revolution. The Soviets had detonated an atomic device. McCarthy’s wild charges provided a ready explanation for these foreign policy disasters: communist subversives were working within the very bowels of the American government.To be sure, McCarthy was not the first to incite anxiety about subversive communists. Congress had already investigated Hollywood for its supposed communist influences, and former State Department employee Alger Hiss was convicted of perjury in January 1950 for testimony dealing with accusations that he spied for the Soviet Union during the 1930s. But McCarthy went a step further, claiming that the U.S. government, and the Department of State in particular, knew that communists were working in their midst.“McCarthyism,” as the hunt for communists in the United States came to be known during the 1950s, did untold damage to many people’s lives and careers, had a muzzling effect on domestic debate on Cold War issues, and managed to scare millions of Americans. McCarthy, however, located no communists and his personal power collapsed in 1954 when he accused the Army of coddling known communists. Televised hearings of his investigation into the U.S. Army let the American people see his bullying tactics and lack of credibility in full view for the first time, and he quickly lost support. The U.S. Senate censured him shortly thereafter and he died in 1957.Don't know what for do you need that. If its' something related to writing, check how can Supreme essay service help you. Good luck!</span>
So, I hope this helps!
Answer:
Yes students should be responsible for their learning.
Explanation:
During this day in age, there is so many resources no matter what teacher you have, to find a good learning source. Weather that be an online tutor or an app that Solves a math equation for you ( reference mathpapa. com). It just takes a will. As William Hazlitt says, "When theres a will theres a way". You just have to have the will to find the way to learn. Theres even the free app that we all know, its called You Tube. It can help you with almost anything you dont understand. From linear equations in math too Romeo and Juliet in English, theres so many tools too use. And its all up to you. All up to us, to learn to our fullest potential. And whats stopping us? The only difference is the will power. So whats your will power? Does it stop at grabbing your phone and searching something on You Tube. Or Does it stop at using your phones G.P.S to the library, Using a map your grandpa gave you saying one day you'll need it. Using the map at the bus stop, to research and fill your mind with knowledge? So my anwser is pro. As a student, you are responsible for your learning.
Informal logic will typically use everyday reasoning.
Logic is supported with reasoning whether it is formal or informal. Since we are referring to <u>informal logic,</u> it makes sense to use simple everyday reasoning.
antithesis: a person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something else:
so the answer would be the use of “united” and “divided”
Answer: Yeah and I say I was born to be dead.
Explanation: