I think it's because they were both humans and both fought for freedom
Alternative explanation for the observed results - The conclusion section of a research poster or report basically contains a summary of the design and testing and analyzes the observed results. If the observed results do not meet the design criteria, then an alternative explanation is given as to why it failed to give the desired result.
Answer:
Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.
Explanation:
The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.
Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.
<span>Conflicts within the Middle East cannot be separated from its peoples' culture. ... culture and tribalism within Islam impacts everything from family relations, to governance, to conflict. Either way, tribesmen are ready to fight.</span>
