This is TRUE because it was a tax protest on the United States in 1791. It was the first tax imposed on a product with the newly formed government.
Relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
<h3>What is relative deprivation?</h3>
It alludes to a starting point to analyze why people join social movements as a result of a situation of inequality within people with whom they identify.
An individual experiences said deprivation when he lacks common goods in other individuals and families in the social environment, affecting his effective situation.
Therefore, we can conclude that relative deprivation is a term that refers to that people join social movements because they feel deprived relative to other people with whom they identify.
Learn more about relative deprivation here: brainly.com/question/26869272
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
The two words that would best replace “fundamental” and “impressive" in the selections above would be central and wondrous.
Option: (D)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The idea of the fundamentality of the systems of transportation of goods and human beings presented here can be referred to as of prime importance around which most other factors of the economy revolve. Hence, the word fundamental can be replaced by 'central'.
- The fact how impressively the new and improved technologies work and contribute to economic growth would simply make anyone wonder about the efficiency of technology. Hence, the world impressive can be replaced by 'wondrous'.
When ya could seee the other car threw y’all blind spot
Answer:Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside of the convention center where the 1984 Republican National Convention was being held in Dallas, Texas. Johnson burned the flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan. He was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a venerated object, including the American flag, if such action were likely to incite anger in others. A Texas court tried and convicted Johnson. He appealed, arguing that his actions were "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case.
Issue
Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Ruling
Yes.
Explanation:
here is your answer let me know if you got it right if you
did just say thanks in rate this
