Answer:
d. None of the answers is correct
$17,000 increase
Explanation:
As per the given question the solution is provided below:-
For reaching the change in income if the special order is accepted we need to follow some steps which are as follows:-
Step 1
Variable manufacturing cost per unit = Variable manufacturing costs ÷ Sale units
= $240,000 ÷ 24,000
= $10
Step 2
Cost related with special order = Number of units × Variable manufacturing cost per unit
= 3,400 × $10
= $34,000
Step 3
Income from special order = Number of units × Selling price
= 3,400 × $15
= $51,000
Therefore the Change in income if special order is accepted = Income from special order- Cost related with special order
= $51,000 - $34,000
= $17,000 increase
d. None of the answers is correct the right answer is $17,000 increase.
To reach the change in income if special order is accepted we simply put the values into formula.
Is this a true or false question if so its true if not can you give me possibility anwsers <span />
According to the Equal Pay Act, the situation presented is an example of wage discrimination based on gender.
The Equal Pay Act is a United States labor law passed in 1963. This law was created to abolish the gender pay gap.
According to this law, employers (public and private) are prohibited from paying differentiated salaries based on sex in jobs that require equal skills, effort and responsibilities, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
Based on the Equal Pay law, the situation of two employees of different sex who perform a job as HR Analyst - classification and compensation and receive different salary if it is discriminatory due to:
- Are employees of the same employer
- They perform the same tasks with the same skill, effort, and responsibility requirements.
- They are in similar or equal working conditions.
According to the foregoing, it can be inferred that it is a differential treatment based on discrimination based on sex.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2396617
One of the main hinders of foreign investors on investing in the United States is that the U.S. is less stringent in regulating securities markets. This can be blamed on the rapid increase of trading volume competition which negates the market regulation.
