Answer:
Spoken by Prince Harry, son of King Henry IV from William Shakespeare's play "Henry IV".
Explanation:
The above given lines are spoken by Prince Harry, the son of King Henry IV from the historical play "Henry IV" by William Shakespeare. Taken from Act II scene iv, the scene shows the young prince and his commoner friends drinking in a tavern named Boarshead Tavern in Eastcheap.
The lines reveals the young Prince recounting how Bardolph had began to live the life of a criminal. Harry had first encountered him stealing wine almost two decades ago. Commenting on his (Bardolph's) drunkenness "<em>blushed extempore</em>" had continued till now, he comments how he could never change. He also asked him why, being armed with his sword, still had to run away, why he had to run away.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
This is not the nineteenth century where there are housewives doing all the household chores whilst the men go off to work and provide for their family. Sure, there are some countries like Uruguay where the female children are taught they have to wash the dishes and fold and iron the clothes whereas if they have a brother, their brother does not. However, I do not find this rigtheous whatsoever. Everyone is equal; we should not discriminate or delegate tasks depending upon our genders.
I believe the answer is: Common underlying principles
Common underlying principles refer to the standard set of mind that we commonly use to approach a certain problem.
If an individual is used to look everything that happen in his/life postiively, that individual would less likely to develop suicidal thought regardless of his/her problems.
I think it is OU, i typed it all out and it showed “ OU “
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
