Answer:
<u>The passage talks about how, after the Boston Tea Party, the British King and Parliament sent troops to the US to show colonies they can’t simply rebel against them.</u>
<u></u>
Explanation:
To understand the passage, we must remember that the Bostom tea party was the American protest carried out by the Sons of Liberty against the British Empire and their rulership. The event’s name comes from the fact that protestors have thrown the tea from British East India Company into the sea from the ships at Boston Harbor.
<u>The passage talks about the immediate aftermath of the protest and the reaction of the British Empire</u>. It explains how the British Parliament had to react quickly to this outcry and debacle. Britains’ king, George III was angry and sent the troops. <u>They needed to punish Boston and the protestors to show other colonies that they can’t go against the laws the empire has put on them.</u>
Answer:
Thematic apperception test
Explanation:
Henry A. Murray and Christiana D. Morgan developed a projective psychological test known as "Thematic apperception test" at Harvard University. It is also known as picture interpretation technique.
Procedure:
The subjects are shown multiple ambiguous pictures so as to seek an involuntary response from them. Their perception of the images reveals hidden motives and the concerns of the society around them. The subjects narrate a story or their feelings about those pictures that includes what, how and why the event is happening. Such an event invokes involuntary display of subconsciousness in the subject. It explores the issues and themes related to the subject's life providing useful information in the psychological assessment.
Answer: Crying your self to sleep
Not eating
thinking that your nothing
your a falilure to your family
sleeping in your room alot
shutting everyone out of your life.
when Wallace get their house assignments from umbc they are generous made for the house and also their vote so they can when they purchase the house it will all you have enough money for it or somebody will vouch it for you because when you have vouchers money can get you everything like it's so crazy like bro I have to do some money over a voucher to have my employment and everything my appointment is like $150,000k on it a voucher is also like 2,000 in cocaine yeah
1. Roman women could hold office- False
2. Roman women could own property- True
3. Roman women could divorce their husbands- True
Explanation:
Roman women has less political and social status than their men. Roman women can not hold office. They can not occupy a higher position in office. Though who belong to elite society they some time hold a position in social hierarchy.
Roman women can bought property and could be its owner also. Roman women have the power to authorize her property in single handle. Roman women have the right to divorce her husband. If a couple is not happy in their marriage then the female partner can take the decision to be separated from her husband.
