1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
5

why is it in the presidents best interest to nominate several federal judges favored be most senators?

History
1 answer:
slamgirl [31]3 years ago
6 0
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives.  Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.  

In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state.  Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution.  Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.”   That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves.  Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate.  As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s  financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.

Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan.  In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.  

Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests.  As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states.  During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented.  Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money.  The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July.  Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House.  On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.

Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state.  State constitutions offered some guidance.  Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties.  Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however.  Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.

According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation.   Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues.  Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House.   On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.

Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators.  During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three.   Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly.  On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania  voted in favor of three senators.  When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.

You might be interested in
A b c d ???<br> Help please
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer: d is the answer

Explanation: The schools that the Freedmen's Bureau and the AMA established inspired resentment among the white population in the South. Radical Republicans continued to support the Bureau, igniting a contest between Congress and the president that intensified during the next several years.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are two issues Theodore Roosevelt focused on during his presidency
ludmilkaskok [199]
1. The population of the United States population had doubled; that meant more demands and work. 
2. One of Theodore's central belief's weren't believed in much, and only a few more presidents followed it.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best states the relationship between the government company management and striking workers during the la
snow_lady [41]

Options:

A.The government nearly always sided with striking workers against companies.

B.Companies often hired government agents to keep striking workers in line.

C.The government nearly always sided with companies against striking workers.

D.Companies often hired government agents to encourage workers to strike.

Answer:

C.The government nearly always sided with companies against striking workers.

Explanation:

    From the rise of the capitalist system (industrialization, formation of markets, banks, businesses), the rise of a new social class took place: the workers, that is, the workers of the capitalist industries. Consequently, social relations emerged between factory owners (explorers) and factory workers (exploited) that permeated the industries' daily lives.

    From these not at all friendly relations between capitalists and workers, two movements emerged in England, the Luddites and the Chartists, who had a common objective: to find solutions to the problems faced by the workers, mainly unemployment (due to the introduction of machinery that replaced several human labor forces). Both ludistas and chartists claimed, through actions (such as the breakdown of industrial machinery), the unemployed workers return to work.

    Another form of workers' claim that did not have much effect was the attempt to achieve better working conditions by requesting them from the government. Generally, the government did not respond to these demands, as the government itself owned industries.

    Over the decades, capitalism has added new features, society has undergone increasing transformations and, thus, the workers needed to articulate new ways of fighting for their causes. In this way, socialist movements emerged from the organization of workers.

7 0
4 years ago
HELP PLEASE ANSWER QUICK**** 10 POINTS****Which of the following situations is an example of external migration? A. moving from
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

it is right trust me... (i think)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the roman republic can everyone participate in government to some degree
SOVA2 [1]
             <span> False.

Women and slaves could not.

Males (although I seem to recall there is something about the poorest of the poor being excluded from certain things in the Republic such as the army, perhaps politics) were divided into groups based on wealth and land: a pyramid scheme. These groups came to collective decisions and cast their vote. Although the largest groups contained the poor, and the smallest groups contained the wealthy ... so the rich, while the minority, could still cast more votes due to how the system was structured. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The forest that exists on the southern tip of the florida peninsula and in mexico is the:
    14·1 answer
  • How many countries in North America have a border with South America?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was Germany annoyed by imperialism
    10·1 answer
  • In the persian gulf war of 1991, 39 allied nations fought against the nation of
    8·1 answer
  • Who supported the expansion of a Japanese empire?
    10·2 answers
  • Why was Martin Luther king important??????
    14·2 answers
  • The Civil War impacted women in a variety ways. Some of the main ways women were<br> impacted were
    11·1 answer
  • What would happen if the legislative branch of government abuses its powers
    9·2 answers
  • Read the following words
    11·1 answer
  • What is the definition of a municipality?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!