The distance around the park is the perimeter.
To find the perimeter add two lengths plus two widths:
Perimeter = 4.6 +4.6 + 2.7 +2.7 = 14.6 miles
Answer:
The statement that is true is:
A debt of $17 is a larger value than a debt of $20.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us look at the statements one after the other to determine if they are true or not:
1) A debt of $17 is a larger value than a debt of $20: This is true because when measuring debts, we will consider the values in the negative sense (-). Therefore, a debt of $17 has a value of (-17) and a debt of $20 has a value of (-20). -17 is larger than - 20 on a number line, hence, a debt of $17 has a larger value for the debtor, than a debt of 20$
2) One half an apple is equivalent to 8 fourths apples:
one half an apple = 
8 fourths of an apple =
. Therefore, one half of an apple is not equivalent to 8 fourth of an apple.
3) 8.01 is a smaller increase in sales than 8.001: This statement is false because 8.001 is counted before 8.01, and the difference between 8.01 and 8.001 is:
8.01 - 8.001 = +0.009, hence, 8.01 is larger than 8.01 by a magnitude of 0.009
4)
is a lower temperature than 6 below zero:

6 below zero = - 6°
On the number line, -6 is smaller than
hence the statement is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
GiVen
g(x) = 8
Now
g(x) = - 2x + 2
8 = -2x + 2
2x = 2 - 8
2x = -6

therefore x = -3
Answer: The ratio of the total cost of the party in 2007 to the total cost of the party in 2008 = 1: 4
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that Kyle's birthday party in 2007 cost $d$ dollars per person and $p$ people attended.
Then , the total cost of the party = Cost per person x Number of people attended.
For 2007, Total cost = d x p = dp (1)
In 2008, the cost per person doubled and the number of people attending the party also doubled.
i.e. Cost per person = 2d
Number of people attended = 2p
For 2008, Total cost = 2d x 2p = 4dp (2)
From (1) and (2) , the ratio of the total cost of the party in 2007 to the total cost of the party in 2008 will be :

Cancel pd from the numerator and the denominator , we get 
Hence, the ratio of the total cost of the party in 2007 to the total cost of the party in 2008 = 1: 4