The correct answer is D. All of the above are reasons for the increase in the Hispanic population in Florida.
Explanation
The question shows two graphs to show the percentage of the white, Asian, black, and Hispanic population in Florida in the years 1990 and 2020. The first graph expresses data about the population in Florida in the year 1990 shows that the population was 12,938,000 people of which 73% were white, 13% were black, 12% were Hispanic, and 1% were Asian. In contrast, the graph that expresses the data of the population of Florida in the year 2020 shows that the population was 19,449,000 people of which 58% were white, 21% were Hispanic, 18% were black and 3% were Asian. Therefore, it can be concluded that the percentage of Hispanics who migrated to Florida increased because the United States is a world power country that offers many job opportunities for people including Hispanic immigrants
Secondly, education in Florida has high-quality standards that would benefit the children of Hispanic immigrants, so they decided to emigrate to Florida.
Thirdly, several countries in Central and South America have suffered violence from guerrillas, gangs, and corrupt governments, which is why they see Florida as an option to avoid being close to these negative social phenomena. So the correct answer is D. All of the above are reasons for the increase in the Hispanic population in Florida.
Answer:
Presidential Library and Museum. Roosevelt Institute. Roosevelt Institute Campus Network.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial.
Roosevelt Island. Four Freedoms Park.
White House Roosevelt Room.
Explanation:
The answer is selective incorporation which is letter b. It is
a principle written into the Constitution that safeguards American citizens
from their states’ ratifying of laws that could break upon their rights.
Selective incorporation is not an act or a law, but a doctrine that has been recognized
and established time and again by the United States Supreme Court. Fundamentally,
selective incorporation allows the federal government to place limitations on
the states’ lawmaking power.
Answer:
Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
Explanation:
After using its judicial review authority in the Marbury case, the Supreme Court for the next 50 years refrained from overturning any federal laws. In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court finally did so (1857).
A judge analyses the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.
The Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856; decided 1857) that all Americans of African heritage, whether free or slave, were not citizens of the United States and could not file lawsuits in federal court. The Court further determined that Congress lacked the authority to outlaw slavery in American territories.
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), unquestionably the most contentious judgement the US Supreme Court has ever made, and also one of the most significant cases in US constitutional history.
It was the first Supreme Court decision to invalidate a federal legislation since Marbury v. Madison, in Cass Sunstein's words.
Since Marbury established judicial review in the context of a jurisdictional refusal, Dred Scott might be considered the first legitimate application of the judicial review power. In addition, it was "one of the first significant cases using the unambiguous term 'purpose of the framers.'
To know more about Supreme Court, visit:
brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ4
