1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
9

2 PART QUESTION

Mathematics
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
8 0
The first answer is B because the bottom half of the proportions are how many km/minutes he CAN run, while the top half of the proportion is how many he WILL run.

He will run 60km in 285 minutes.
You might be interested in
This problem uses the teengamb data set in the faraway package. Fit a model with gamble as the response and the other variables
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

A. 95% confidence interval of gamble amount is (18.78277, 37.70227)

B. The 95% confidence interval of gamble amount is (42.23237, 100.3835)

C. 95% confidence interval of sqrt(gamble) is (3.180676, 4.918371)

D. The predicted bet value for a woman with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10, which shows a negative result and does not fit with the data, so it is inferred that model (c) does not fit with this information

Step-by-step explanation:

to)

We will see a code with which it can be predicted that an average man with income and verbal score maintains an appropriate 95% CI.

attach (teengamb)

model = lm (bet ~ sex + status + income + verbal)

newdata = data.frame (sex = 0, state = mean (state), income = mean (income), verbal = mean (verbal))

predict (model, new data, interval = "predict")

lwr upr setting

28.24252 -18.51536 75.00039

we can deduce that an average man, with income and verbal score can play 28.24252 times

using the following formula you can obtain the confidence interval for the bet amount of 95%

predict (model, new data, range = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

28.24252 18.78277 37.70227

as a result, the confidence interval of 95% of the bet amount is (18.78277, 37.70227)

b)

Run the following command to predict a man with maximum values ​​for status, income, and verbal score.

newdata1 = data.frame (sex = 0, state = max (state), income = max (income), verbal = max (verbal))

predict (model, new data1, interval = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

71.30794 42.23237 100.3835

we can deduce that a man with the maximum state, income and verbal punctuation is going to bet 71.30794

The 95% confidence interval of the bet amount is (42.23237, 100.3835)

it is observed that the confidence interval is wider for a man in maximum state than for an average man, it is an expected data because the bet value will be higher than the person with maximum state that the average what you carried s that simultaneously The, the standard error and the width of the confidence interval is wider for maximum data values.

(C)

Run the following code for the new model and predict the answer.

model1 = lm (sqrt (bet) ~ sex + status + income + verbal)

we replace:

predict (model1, new data, range = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

4,049523 3,180676 4.918371

The predicted sqrt (bet) is 4.049523. which is equal to the bet amount is 16.39864.

The 95% confidence interval of sqrt (wager) is (3.180676, 4.918371)

(d)

We will see the code to predict women with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10.

newdata2 = data.frame (sex = 1, state = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10)

predict (model1, new data2, interval = "confidence")

lwr upr setting

-2.08648 -4.445937 0.272978

The predicted bet value for a woman with status = 20, income = 1, verbal = 10, which shows a negative result and does not fit with the data, so it is inferred that model (c) does not fit with this information

4 0
3 years ago
Graph the linear inequality X<1
tester [92]
Ohh wow nice, do your own work lazy person
8 0
3 years ago
*ANSWER CORRECTLY TO BE BRAINILEAST*
posledela

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

The mode of the set is the number that occurs the most. In this case, 90 occurs more than any of the other terms. You can keep track using a tally chart:

80     |

82     |

90     ||

92     |

86     |

74     |

68     |

88     |

98     |

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Picture attachment below
Ipatiy [6.2K]

The answer is No, they are not proportional. This is because 8/42 is not equal to 20/105.

6 0
3 years ago
−3.5=x4 please help me
Studentka2010 [4]
The answer is -0.875
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP ME THANKS ;) for number 1 through 11 QUICKLY
    7·1 answer
  • the angle of depression from the top ski lift is 57 degrees if the vertical distance from the top and bottom ot the lift is 1200
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate the polynomial for the given value of x: f(x) =3x^3+5x^2+x-2 when x=2
    12·1 answer
  • How to work on this? (x+1) (x+1) (x+1) what the answers will be?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP!! ASAP!!! PLEASE!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • The office worker can stamp 25 letters per minute.
    9·2 answers
  • Using the equation 4x - 7 = 13, choose all the steps that are used to solve the equation.
    8·2 answers
  • F(x) = -4(x+3)+6(x+4)
    7·1 answer
  • Given: three halves times x minus ten equals fifty
    13·1 answer
  • 2.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!