Answer:
The therapist's goal is most clearly consistent with the aims of: psychodynamic therapy.
Explanation:
<u>Psychodynamic therapy, or insight-oriented therapy, aims to help the client develop self-awareness. The therapist works with the client in order to help him/her understand the influence that the past has over the present. Therefore, present behavior is seen as a consequence of unresolved conflicts, traumas, dysfunctional relationships and so on from the past. They cause symptoms and needs to manifest in an unhealthy manner. </u>Notice that this is precisely what was described in the question. Grace's therapist wants to help her see and understand that her current relationship with her husband is influenced by her previous relationship with her own brothers during childhood.
Contextual
i really hope this helps
Answer:
Option C, a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court structure of the United States. The procedures of the Supreme Court takes place following the constitution of the United States along with various federal laws and the internal regulations of the court. The court has the appellate authority over all the federal as well as the state courts that incorporates a constitutional law.
Though the Supreme Court hears appeals from the lower courts it is all up to the Supreme Court that which case to be heard first.
Therefore, in the given options C will be the first case to be heard by the Supreme Court. The main reason for this is that all the other cases can be appealed in the lower or state court while this one "a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador" is the case between two nations.
Answer:
watershed is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The statement is "True".
It is normal, when tuning in to another person talk, to
figure an answer while the other individual is as yet talking. This implies the
individual is not by any stretch of the imagination tuning in to all that is
being said. Even good audience members are regularly blameworthy of
fundamentally assessing what is being said before completely understanding the
message that the speaker is attempting to convey. The outcome is that
suspicions are made and conclusions came to about the speaker's implying that
may be incorrect.
