Answer:
can be achieved by exploiting resources that are competitively valuable, rare, and hard to imitate by rivals
Explanation:
A resource-based strategy is a form of the technique used by business managers to efficiently utilized the existing and valuable resources of the firm. These resources would be difficult to come by for the competitors such that it is hard for competitors to replicate. Thereby leading a sustainable or long term competitive advantage to the firm
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is A resource-based strategy "can be achieved by exploiting resources that are competitively valuable, rare, and hard to imitate by rivals."
In the given case the accounts were previously written off by debiting the Allowance for doubtful debts accounts now in order to revive these accounts receivable, we should Debit the Accounts Receivable and credit the Allowance for doubtful debts accounts. Hence the account to be credited is Allowance for doubtful debts accounts.
Hence the answer shall be Allowance for doubtful debts accounts
Answer:
Gift Tax GSTT
Explanation:
In such a scenario, Grandma and Grandpa Generoushave a current liability to the Gift Tax GSTT. This tax rate applies to Grandma and Grandpa Generous because the gift exceeds the limit per individual for gifting and because they have exhausted their lifetime gift-tax exemption. Meaning that they have to pay taxes on this gift of $5.43 million which according to the GSTT guidelines is a fixed rate of 40% of the gift that was given.
<h2>Copyright Protection
</h2>
- A copyright will protect the following categories of works:
literary works
- musical works, including any accompanying words
- dramatic works, including any accompanying music
- pantomimes and choreographic works
- pictorial, graphic and sculptural works
- motion pictures and other audiovisual works
- computer programs (sometimes the graphical user interface) and websites
<h2>Patents
</h2>
Patents protect processes, methods and inventions that are "novel," "non-obvious" and "useful." If granted, a patent gives you a 20-year monopoly on selling, using, making or importing an invention into the United States.
(These are 2 characteristics of property rights)
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
