Answer:
i'm sorry but where's the question?
Answer:
Multiply the number by the percent (e.g. 87 * 68 = 5916)
Divide the answer by 100 (Move decimal point two places to the left) (e.g. 5916/100 = 59.16)
Round to the desired precision (e.g. 59.16 rounded to the nearest whole number = 59)
Step-by-step explanation:
lets say for example 234
234/2 = 117 and the percentage were looking for is ummmm 25% well 25% is 1/4th of 234 making it 1/2 of 117 25% of 234 is 58.8 lets do a harder one what is 47% of 234 Divide n by 100.
Multiply the result by x. making it 109.98
$92,28-$18=$74.28
$74.28<span>÷$0.06= 1238minutes</span>
Answer:
No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.
X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1
n₁= 12
X[bar]₁= 1000mg
S₁= 23 mg
X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2
n₂= 15
X[bar]₂= 1016mg
S₂= 24mg
It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?
The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05
since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:
[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ±
*
]


[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57*
]
[-34.80;2.80] mg
The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.
I hope it helps!
Answer:
39.9
Step-by-step explanation:
90 - 50.1 = 39.9
90 comes from complimentary. Complimentary means that 2 or more angles reach a sum of 90 degrees.