If someone were accused of robbing a bank in Georgia, in which court would they initially be tried? Question 10 options:

Social Studies

2 answers:

Katarina [22]3 years ago

6 0

THe answer is:

A. The trial court

A bank robbery unless it has federal funds, which not all banks have, should be trialed in the trial court, if they appeal they can go to the other courts, ultimaltely arribing at the Georgia Supreme Court which is the highest judicial authority in the State of Georgia.

Vlad [161]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is a Federal District Court.

Robbing a bank is a Federal crime, so the case would be removed to Federal District Court for trial.

So, A.

You might be interested in

The Navigator's Tools

Contact [7]

Answer:

It's A neither

Explanation:

During the renaissance ships sailed the Atlantic ocean

7 0

3 years ago

Article vi of the u.s. constitution establishes that federal law is __________ in conflicts between federal and state law.scienc

lesantik [10]

I'm not sure of the exact word you are looking for, but the general idea is that the federal law will always reign supreme if there is ever a conflict between the federal and state laws. Federal law is superior or higher-ranking or more preferable, etc.

Here is the exact phrasing from Article VI of the US Constitution: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

3 0

3 years ago

From the Leadership styles for Healthcare personnel, which one focus on personal development and recommended for the top personn

Alenkasestr [34]

I have no idea...........

4 0

3 years ago

What are some common duties of mayors?select all that apply.

Nesterboy [21]

A and D.
Hope that helps

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose Bekah agrees to do bodywork on Fatima's car. In exchange, Fatima agrees to be a poker dealer at Bekah's underground casi

Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the agreement between Bekah and Fatima would not be enforceable. This is mainly due to the fact that the agreement breaks one of the state's laws and would therefore be considered a crime, which they would both be sentenced for.

6 0

3 years ago