QUICK !! What is the image point of (2,-7) after a translation right 4 units and up 3 units ?
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<h2>Answer with explanation:</h2>
Given : In a restaurant, the proportion of people who order coffee with their dinner is p.
Sample size : n= 144
x= 120
The null and the alternative hypotheses if you want to test if p is greater than or equal to 0.85 will be :-
Null hypothesis : [ it takes equality (=, ≤, ≥) ]
Alternative hypothesis : [its exactly opposite of null hypothesis]
∵Alternative hypothesis is left tailed, so the test is a left tailed test.
Test statistic :
Using z-vale table ,
Critical value for 0.05 significance ( left-tailed test)=-1.645
Since the calculated value of test statistic is greater than the critical value , so we failed to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion : We have enough evidence to support the claim that p is greater than or equal to 0.85.
Answer:
1) z = -6.32
2) p-value = 0.001 × 10^(-2)
3) we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told that In a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans, only 400 could name at least one justice.
Thus:
Sample proportion; p^ = 400/1000 = 0.4
Sample size: n = 1000
We want to find if there is convincing evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice.
Thus, the hypothesis is defined as;
Null hypothesis:H0: p ≥ 0.5
Alternative hypothesis: Ha < 0.5
Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (p^ - p)/√(p(1 - p)/n)
Plugging in the relevant values;
z = (0.4 - 0.5)/√(0.5(1 - 0.5)/1000)
z = -6.32
From online p-value from z-score calculator attached, using z = -6.32; significance level of 0.01; one tailed hypothesis;
We have:
p-value = 0.00001 = 0.001 × 10^(-2)
The p-value is less than the significance level and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court
