1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OverLord2011 [107]
3 years ago
9

The most rural and agrarian of all the regions in the United States was the northeast, west, or south?

History
2 answers:
IceJOKER [234]3 years ago
5 0
The South was the most rural and agrarian area of the U.S. 
stepan [7]3 years ago
3 0

The most rural and agrarian of all the regions in the United States was the South.

Historically, the South depended heavily on agriculture, and was highly rural until after 1945. Since then it has become more industrialized and urban and has attracted national and international migrants. The southern United States is now among the fastest growing areas in the country.

You might be interested in
Which most accurately describes the impact that the collapse of the Soviet Union had on the Middle East?
EastWind [94]

Answer:

The correct answer is D) The Soviet collapse caused governments like Iraq and Iran to behave more erratically.

Explanation:

During the cold war period both Iran and Iraq were closely aligned with the Soviet Union. In Iraq, the Ba'ath Party had swept to power and was based on socialist and secular values.

In Iran, the Islamic revolution had brought into power, men who were against American influence in the region.

Being close to the Soviet Union provided them with significant support in terms of trade, economics and military support. However, with the fall of the Soviet Union, this support almost evaporated overnight.

After this, the international relations of these countries became even more difficult and they began to behave erratically.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the following:
Rudik [331]
1. B
2. C
3. D
4. E
5. A
4 0
3 years ago
What is the american document that recognized natural rights
slega [8]
The Constitution recognized natural rights. Hope this helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. What are three characteristics of Communism?<br> a.<br> b.<br> C.
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

A.Play

B.ussr

C.anthem

Explanation:

*angry Stalin noises* Here is 5 characteristics. 1.Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes

2.A heavy progressive or graduated income tax

3. Abolition of all right of inheritance

4. Confiscation of the property of all immigrants and rebels

5. Equal liability of all to labor and establishment of industrial armies

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Southwest Asia became the center of an agricultural revolution. Which of the following is not a reason for this? A. It had ferti
    10·1 answer
  • Describe in detail the causes of 1812
    7·1 answer
  • What group got given the right to vote in 1971?<br><br><br> Plz help me quick!
    14·1 answer
  • What were the ideas of enlightment philosophers based on?
    8·1 answer
  • Why were more english workers available, despite the negatives of factory work, after 1750?
    12·2 answers
  • The abolition movement that ended with the emancipation of the slaves started in: the Pacific coast states the Northeast region
    11·1 answer
  • How did ports africa help british east india comoany?
    8·1 answer
  • Why were Americans angered by the British practice of impressment
    9·1 answer
  • What motivated people in europe to for new trading routes
    7·1 answer
  • 24. Who was involved with cleopatra VII that was<br>defeated by Octavian?<br>Down​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!