1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
3 years ago
10

In the year 2000,there were 8.7 deaths per 1000 reidents in the United States.If there were 281,421,906 residents in the U.S.dur

ing 2000,how many people died that year?
Mathematics
1 answer:
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
7 0
\frac{deaths}{residents} \: \frac{8.7}{1000} \: \frac{x}{281421906}
Find the "difference" between the residents but division.

281421906/1000 = 281421.906
You always have to do the same to the top
8.7×281421.906 = 2,448,370.5822

There were 2,448,370.5822 deaths

Tell me if it helps!!
You might be interested in
THIS IS 100 POINTS SOMEBODY PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HELP MEEEEE
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer: Option #4: the 0.2 could be changed to 2.

Explanation:

The table is designed to make the concept of percentages more understandable. The table first allocates the total amount of 70 in terms of its "fifths," or 20% parts. Then it expresses these parts in the last row of the table, showing that 20% of 70 is 14 and all the five parts sum up to 70 again.

Now, Mikel is supposed to express 40% of the amount. So she writes (incorrectly): 0.2 * 14. This statement needs to be changed to 2 * 14 (two times 14 = 28), to correspond to 2 times 20%, or 40%  of 70.

This is reflected in the last (fourth) option "The 0.2 in the expression could be changed to 2."

Option #3 is incorrect because changing 14 to 70, will result in an incorrect number (2.8).

Options 1 and 2 are similarly incorrect (as can be easily verified)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
C and d please help me im stuck i promise i will give a thank
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

attach the graph in orfer for us to answer

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Simplify 72 meters over1.5 cenimeters
trasher [3.6K]
We have 1 m = 100cm
          ⇒ 72 m = 7200 cm 
          ⇒ 7200 / 1.5= 4800 cm = 48 m
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression is equivelent please help
vekshin1
=−2m2−mn+4n2−2m+5n so C
4 0
3 years ago
One angle of an isosceles triangle measures 90°. Which other angles could be in that isosceles triangle? Choose all that apply.
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

45°

Step-by-step explanation:

(180-90)/2 = 90/2 = 45°

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If the perimeter of a rectangle is 318 inches, find the width and length. what's the answer?
    12·2 answers
  • Plz i need to get 100% on this so plz have the right answer
    14·1 answer
  • Do any of you know how to easily and properly convert a mixed fraction to a decimal?​
    12·2 answers
  • A car is traveling at a rate of 80 kilometers per hour. What is the car's rate in miles per hour? How many miles will the car tr
    8·1 answer
  • The ordered pairs (6, 8), (9,12),(x, 20),(18,y) represent a proportional relationship. find the value of x and y. (choose two an
    13·1 answer
  • Help me with this math problem plz
    8·1 answer
  • The nth term of a sequence is -3-3n what is the 6th term
    5·1 answer
  • GET 25 POINTS FOR THIS QUESTION AND ALSO BRAINLEST!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Please I need help fast!!!!!???
    6·1 answer
  • Draw a tree diagram to represent the following scenario. You choose a random letter from the word SANDWICH. How many possible ou
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!