I believe the answer is: precedent
In social setting, we can see a precedent in court ruling.
When a supreme court ruled a controversial case, the other courts would most likely use the ruling as a precedent to settle similar cases that might appear in the future.
The jews wander without a country for about 40 years before reaching there destination
In amendment two third of the total senate and house representatives rectified the bill to date have been proposed. Up to the date 27 amendments were approved.
Explanation:
In 1789 it was decided that how a amendment would become a part of the constitution. All 27 amendments were rectified in the presence of two third of senate and house representatives. For final approval it need to go through a voting system including the members of the senate.
Congress has the final power of giving approval of the appeal made by two third member of the legislative members. Two ways of proposing an amendment either to call two third member for voting or to call them for a national convention.
Alfred Adler counter argue Sigmund Freud’s concept of
psychological defense mechanism by his ways of engaging the ‘striving for
superiority’ rather than focusing or engaging on Freud’s ‘sex and aggression as
a motivation’ as it counter argues the psychological defense mechanism.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Free will." <span>An important difference between humanistic and psychoanalytic approaches is that humanistic psychologists believe in the importance of free will.</span>