Answer:
correct answer is Option D
Explanation:
Option D - elastic, and the demand curve will be horizontal.
The quantity would be changed infinitely with a samll change in the the price. It means that demand is perfectly elastic and the curve is horizontal as the small change up decreases the quantity to zero and small change down increases the quantity infinity. Thus, option D is the correct ams of this questionwer
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
Intermind core intellectual property assets.
Identify
complementary intellectual property mix
optimize the intellectual property mix
Regularly elevate intellectual data
Create an innovation culture
Answer:
Indirect
Direct
Iindirect
Explanation:
Direct cost is the cost that can be traced back to the cost object whereas the indirect cost cannot be traced back. Cost object is something to which the costs are assigned. in this case the cafeteria workers are directly working with the cost object:Frozen pizza plant, hence the cost is directly associated with that. Janitorial supplies and property insurance cost does not directly relate to The cost object given here so it will be classified as indirect cost.
Options:
Yes, Joe is an agent who has that authority.
No, Joe is an employee, but the employee does not have that authority.It depends whether Joe signed a written contract for his employment.
Yes, Joe is an employee.
No, not unless he possesses authority from the principal because Joe is an independent contractor.
Answer:No, not unless he possesses authority from the principal because Joe is an independent contractor
Explanation: An independent contractor is a third party engaged by a principal to transact certain specific jobs or accomplish a certain task on his behalf. An independent contractor does not have any power or authority to represent his or her principal especially when he or she is not authorized to do that on behalf of the principal.
JOE DOESN'T HAVE THE POWER OR AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO ANY CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANOTHER ENTITY FOR HIS PRINCIPAL EXCEPT WHEN GIVEN THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO.
