The greater the speed of two identical masses, the greater the kinetic energy. So, the mass that is traveling twice as fast as the other has much more kinetic energy. The formula for kinetic energy is KE=m*v^2 (kinetic energy equals mass times velocity squared), and velocity is the same as speed in this case because it is squared. So, the mass traveling twice as fast has 4 times the kinetic energy, because 2 squared=2*2=4.
Answer: The mass traveling twice as fast has four times the kinetic energy.
The length of a vessel is directly proportional to its resistance: the longer the veessel, the greater the resistance and the lower the flow. As with blood volume, this makes intuitive sense, since the increased surface area of the vessel will impede the flow of blood.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
This describes standards that apply to good clinical practice relative to clinical trials involving human subjects or health products used by humans. ICH stands for International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH brings together regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical industry. E6 was a series of guidelines to ensure good clinical practice (GCP).
I think the answer is yes and No. . Yes, Fish are considered a sustainable resource. A sustainable resource is a resource an environmental resource that doesn't harm the environment. Fish are helping the environment. However fish have waste and the waste is dangerous to the environment.
