1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
3 years ago
6

How did better transportation affect the growth and urbanization of cities?

History
1 answer:
son4ous [18]3 years ago
6 0
Better transportation affected the growth and urbanization of cities by allowing more people to travel, which in turn led to more people settling down in these cities to start a new life. 
Better communication affected the growth and urbanization of cities by allowing people to understand each other better, which led to more people coming to these cities and socializing, which improved economy. People who can communicate can perform business better and communicate outside of the city, drawing more people there.
You might be interested in
The continental congress endorsed a plan that called for the colonies to
Ksju [112]
fix the Articles Of Confederation
but they actually ended up writing the whole constitution
8 0
2 years ago
What is the effect of 9/11?
Gemiola [76]

Here are some effects of 9/11

1. Many Survivors still have health problems facing them today due to effects of 9/11

2. The TSA was tasked with instituting new security procedures and managing screenings at every commercial airport checkpoint in the country

3. The U.S. intelligence state boomed in the wake of 9/11. The growth resulted in a increase in government oversight, mainly through a clandestine network of phones and web surveillance.

4.  9/11 Also led to more of an effort to train more military personal to travel to the middle east and eradicate terrorism.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role does the law of supply and demand play in a command economy? A. The law of supply and demand functions in reverse beca
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

C. The law of supply and demand does not apply because, in a command economy, the government controls the market.

Explanation:

The command economy is an economic system where the economic decision will be taken by the government as to what and how to produce goods. It will not depend on the law of supply and demand as the market economy does.

5 0
2 years ago
What did the South fear would happen if the North had an increased number of representatives in the House of Representatives?
vlabodo [156]
The South feared that the if the North had more representatives, they would try to abolish slavery
7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the late 1800s, patterns of opium consumption in the united states __________.
    12·1 answer
  • How will an increased supply of imported Mexican fruits and vegetables most likely affect Texas' economy?
    12·2 answers
  • What types of technology changed farming in Texas after the Civil War era? List at least three different types of technology.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these was one cause of the outbreak of the Red Scare?. A. the revolution in Russia. B. the Wall Street bombing. C. the
    13·2 answers
  • What were the names of the two atomic bombs made in Los Alamos
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true about the separation of powers, or constitutionalism?
    10·2 answers
  • Which was NOT an advantage of the North during the Civil War? a. better generals and soldiers b. better railroads c. more factor
    10·1 answer
  • Why did many U.S. senators object to Article X of the Treaty of Versailles and how did this affect the
    12·1 answer
  • 12
    11·1 answer
  • How do butter change when it is heated
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!