Answer: Deepening the Savannah harbor will also allow neo-Panamax ships to call on the port with heavier cargo loads. This will lower fuel and transportation costs netting the nation hundreds of millions of dollars per year in savings to the economy. The benefits of the completed SHEP will be $7.30 for each $1 invested in the deepening.
I think the correct term to fill in the blank would be "thesis". The main point or central idea that a writer states and then endeavors to prove is called a thesis. It is <span>a statement or theory that is put forward as a premise to be maintained or proved. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Answer:
Many cities were overcrowded with limited housing and few sanitation services.
Explanation:
During the late 1800s, urban areas grew very fast because economic opportunities were better than in the countryside. This attracted people from rural areas, and also from abroad, who flocked to the cities too fast for the cities infraestructure to keep up with.
This made most cities at the time very overcrowded, with few public services that were overstrained, and with serious problems in terms of sanitation and public safety. However, people could still earn higher incomes than in the countryside, and despite all these problems, the cities did not stop being attractive for both domestic and international migration.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
I believe the correct answer is: its emphasis on planned
efforts focusing on people and their interrelationships in organizations
Organizational development (OD) represents a system wide
application of behavioral science knowledge which primary goal is to develop,
improve and reinforce the strategies, structures and processes that will lead
to organizational effectiveness in future.
Therefore, the essence of an organizational development (OD)
approach to change is its emphasis on planned efforts focusing on people and
their interrelationships in organizations.
