Correct answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government. It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.
Answer:
D. The Abbasid state was headed by a caliph who was theoretically the state's supreme religious and political leader.
Explanation:
Caliphs concentrated in their hands religious and political power. The Abbasid caliphs, who reproached their Umayyad predecessors for behaving like secular rulers, tried to outline their own approach to government in Islamic terms and, accordingly, to the extent that they managed, they tried to adhere to a religious orientation in politics.
I think b and d ( the second and last) are good but idk
The politicians that were most likely to be associated with these kinds of statements against the abolition of slavery were <u>2. Ross Barnett and 4. George Wallace</u>.
<h3>What legislation abolished slavery?</h3>
Slavery was legally abolished with the 13th Amendment of 1867.
Before that time, President Lincoln had made the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War.
Thus, as prominent members of the Dixiecrats, Governors Barnett and Wallace were more likely to be associated with statements attacking slavery abolition than Daley and Humphrey.
Learn more about slavery abolition at brainly.com/question/26484718
#SPJ1
After Anastasio Somoza fell from power, his son took over and continued ruling through autocratic means for twenty years until his government fell to Sandinista communist forces.
Anastasio Somoza was
the Nicaraguan autocratic ruler from 1936-1956. He was assassinated in 1956 and his son took over until the Sandinista communist
rebels defeated his government.
<span />
