1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
3 years ago
11

Today, society sees slavery as a moral issue. During the antebellum era how did the southmainly view slavery

History
1 answer:
love history [14]3 years ago
6 0
While today we see it as a moral issue, the South back in the Antebellum era saw it as an economical issue.
You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the Articles of Confederation?
VashaNatasha [74]
I believe the answer is B
5 0
3 years ago
Under mercantilism, a nation's wealth was measured by the amount of
Inessa [10]
Ya I wanna see you tomorrow I love you too bby was a way better to go eat for some
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Arrange the probable events of the development of Hinduism in the croorect order​
GaryK [48]

Answer:

no options man

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, on whom did the Confederation Congress rely to enforce its laws?
xz_007 [3.2K]

<em>A.  Individual states.</em>

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. They were known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the government, only to the states. Under the Articles, the government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, and other important aspects of what a government needs to do.

Since most of the power went to the states, it was very hard to do anything. The Confederation Congress relied on the states in order to enforce any laws and 9 out of 13 of the states had to agree with it.

Eventually, people started to realize how the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good and was potentially harming the country. The people who believed in this and wanted to amend the Articles were called Federalists. On the other hand, people who were in support of the Articles and wanted the power to be in the hands of the states were called Anti-Federalists.

When the<em> Constitutional Convention of 1787</em> was called, the original goal was to amend the Articles of Confederation. This did not happen though. The Articles actually ended up getting scrapped altogether and the United States Constitution was created instead.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Indians did not understand the European notion of "total war" because for them, war was not about destroying your opponent,
Verizon [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • While in office, president dwight
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following regions is not a major coal-producing region?
    10·1 answer
  • What movement began in the early 1920s?
    11·1 answer
  • How was the Vietnam War different from the Korean War?
    10·2 answers
  • To be unfair in judgment; to be prejudiced and show partiality is
    11·2 answers
  • Locke’s belief in a person
    14·1 answer
  • Please help asap!! i beg!!
    10·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between historical questions and historical
    5·1 answer
  • · Helped set the stage for European conflict that would eventually result in World War II.
    9·1 answer
  • What is a significant impact of the case that determined the U.S. Supreme Court could find acts of Congress unconstitutional?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!