<span>21.12 is 25.6% of 82.5</span>
hope this helps!! :)
have a good day!! :D
plz mark brainliest!! XD
Answer: fourth option
Explanation:1) the pair x = 3 f(x) = 0, leads you to probe this:
f(3) = 0 = A [4 ^ (3 - 1) ] + C = 0
=> A [4^2] = - C
A[16] = - C
if A = 1/4
16 / 4 = 4 => C = - 4
That leads you to the function f(x) = [1/4] 4 ^( x - 1) - 4
2) Now you verify the images for that function for all the x-values of the table:
x = 2 => f(2) + [1/4] 4 ^ (2 - 1) - 4 = [1/4] 4 - 4 = 4 / 4 - 4 = 1 - 4 = - 3 => check
x = 3 => f(3) = [1/4] 4^ (3 - 1) - 4 = [1/4] 4^2 - 4 = 16 / 4 - 4 = 4 - 4 = 0 => check
x = 4 -> f(4) = [1/4] 4^ (4-1) - 4 = [1/4] 4^(3) - 4 = (4^3) / 4 - 4 = 4^2 - 4 = 16 - 4 = 12 => check.
Therefore, you have proved that the answer is the fourth option.
Answer:
Correlation requires both variables to be quantitative.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient measures the strength of relationship between two quantitative variables. In the given scenario correlation between sex of American workers and their income is computed and indicated that there is a high correlation between them. The sex of American worker is a categorical variable or a qualitative variable while income of American worker is a quantitative variable. The correlation between a quantitative variable and a qualitative variable can't be computed. So, the statement explains the blunder in the given scenario is "Correlation requires both variables to be quantitative".
7.07 so I think you'd leave it at 7 for your answer
Answer:
12x+19.95=13x+9.95
19.95=x+9.95
10=x
So after 10 classes the cost will be the same
12(10)+19.95=120+19.95= $139.95
13(10)=9.95=130+9.95= $139.95