Answer:
The answer is: Stone can report $8,750 as deferred income tax liability
Explanation:
Deferred income tax liability: income tax owed by a business that is put off into future years because a difference exists between GAAP accounting (in this case book depreciation) and income tax accounting.
The deferred tax liability is based on the difference on depreciation. Since 20x9 is Stone Co.'s first year of operations, the depreciation difference in this year must equal the net future depreciation difference.
To calculate the deferred tax liability balance we take the difference in depreciation and multiply it by the future tax rate: $25,000 x 35% = $8,750.
The correct options are
- own a guitar
- checking account
- stocks and bonds
- own a motorcycle
A resource having economic worth that a person, business, or nation possesses or controls with the hope that it would someday be useful is referred to as an asset. The balance sheet of a business lists assets. They are divided into four categories: tangible, financial, fixed, and current. They are acquired or produced in order to raise a company's worth or improve the operations of the company. Whether it's industrial equipment or a patent, an asset may be viewed of as anything that, in the future, can create cash flow, lower expenditures, or increase sales. A resource having economic worth that a person, business, or nation possesses or controls with the hope that it would someday be useful is referred to as an asset.
To know more about assets refer to brainly.com/question/19733618
#SPJ4
After all resulting adjustments have been completed, the new equilibrium price will less than the initial price and output. The same will happen to the industry output. In each situation in which <span>an increase in product demand occurs in a decreasing-cost industry the result is: </span>the new long-run equilibrium price is lower than the original long-run equilibrium price.
21 tasks, if you use your lunch break and your 2 15 minute breaks
Somebody whose job is to provide analytics or research should always be someone who is very good at quantitative analysis. They should be good with math and numbers, because their job is to analyze a business. The same goes for research. A good researcher is good at math because they have to analyze large datasets. This person would also be pretty detail-oriented because they need to make sure that they are not making small mistakes, as small mistakes could result in poor decisions that come out of their analysis.
Does that make sense?
